|
wrong - unbalanced |
~ Balanced ~ |
wrong - unbalanced |
| The KJV is an outdated version.
We have higher knowledge, better scholars in our time. |
The KJV is the preserved Word of God.
It is the only version which is totally trustworthy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The King James does not have doctrinal errors, it is truly preserved. It is not open to dating. New versions detract from the Bible, confuse and adulterate. "Thee's" etc keep the context of reverence for God. ALL periods of history have used them because the Bible is a Sacred book | The KJV has no words at all which must be explained to modern man. Therefore no equivalent should ever be used to explain. |
|
|
The KJV can be translated into foreign languages, and still be the preserved Word of God. As long as the Textus Receptus...KJV only is used as the source. | There should never be any foreign language Versions of the KJV. English is a universal language, and the KJV should be used in that language. No foreign language version is the inspired Word of God. |
|
|
The KJV is the only version that exists that is true to the inspired originals. The new versions mutilate God's message to man. | The KJV is not only a better version than the new version, it is a magnificient improvement on the Textus Receptus. IT HAS BEEN "TRANSLATED" like Enoch. |
despatch@mail.cth.com.au