Subject:Balaam’s Ass Speaks N/L
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997
From: SteveVanN
To: despatch@mail.cth.com.au,
Report on the work and Prayer Letter July 1997 Edition By Steve Van
Nattan:
Editor: Balaam’s Ass Speaks URL: http://www.balaams-ass.com E-Mail:
stevevann@aol.com
A Journal for saints on the Narrow Way with Jesus
Greetings in the Name of Christ: .....C. PETER WAGNER PLOTS !
June and July were somewhat traumatic. We were told by our server that we would have to move along to another server because we were politically incorrect. This, of course, is their right, but it certainly shows who gets the “freedom of speech.” Our offense was in that we deal with Buddhism and sodomy on our Web Journal.
The Lord allowed us to find another server at much better rates. We are thankful to the Lord for this outcome, though the transition was frightening. ... You readers have shown a great deal of interest in Brownsville, Toronto Blessing, PK, and a new devilish outburst called Strategic Level Spiritual Warfare. SLSW was hatched by Peter Wagner from Fuller Seminary. This is oxymoronic since Fuller is one of the least likely places to find a struggle going on against Satan. The David du Plessis Center is at Fuller, along with the repository of the World Council of Churches in the USA - both are vicious Satanic forces.
So, what is going on? Wagner is using known areas of zeal in the Charismatic and Fundamental arenas to launch the World Council’s and Christian Solidarity Inter-national’s agenda in the USA. What agenda? Answer: First, they want to gather the Christian Church in the USA into the occult and spiritualist grip of a club of religious royalists and Anglican snobs in the UK. Second, they want to make fools of anyone who will not submit to the above club in the UK.
We have documentation for this, and an article will soon be featured in the Third Wave section of the Journal. It will be the biggest bomb we have dropped on Satan’s forces to date, and it will hit Peter Wagner hard. We already get E-Mail asking us to define Wagner’s plots. Churches are starting to have second thoughts about his books.
Peter Wagner is at the bottom of at least five movements in the USA. He started the movements, which started the movements, which started the movements, and he now orchestrates his entourage very judiciously, always moving it toward world religious union. His great goal, according to his missions rag, is the year 2000, so patience will be in order. But keep an eye on him.
What are the five movements Wagner has hatched?
1. Vineyard ministries
2. Toronto Blessing
3. Promise Keepers (from Vineyard Ministries)
4. Brownsville (from Toronto via Steve Hill and the UK)
5. Strategic Level Spiritual Warfare
Next?
Who knows?
But I suspect he will soon launch a deliverance ministry. Benny Hinn
is right now denouncing nearly all of the manifestations at Brownsville
and casting out the devils of barking dogs. Hinn is the most clever strategist
in the whole pack of Satanic hounds. He may have to be taken out by Wagner
if Wagner is going to rise to the top. I wouldn’t be surprised if an old
girl friend turned up to finger Hinn any day now. If so, go sit in the
Fuller faculty lounge to hear the score.
=============================
Subject: Mary
Date:Tue, 26 Aug 1997
From: “Stef O’Grady” <stef@plinet.com
To: despatch@mail.cth.com.au
Dear Ed & Stef,
I was shocked at the news of Mary possibly being declared by the Pope
as Co-Redemptrix. Until I saw & bought the most recent issue of Newsweek
Magazine. (Aug. 25, 1997, pp 48-56) Kenneth Woodward, the writer did a
fair job in the article. It is worth buying & reading yourself. Find
below a few choice morsels for digestion.
.In the place of the Holy Trinity, it would appear, there would be a kind of Holy Quartet,with Mary playing the multiple roles of daughter of the Father, mother of the Son, and spouse of the Holy Spirit....”
...Last June the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, reported that the Holy See had asked a commission of 23 Mariologists to study the proposal. These are specialists in the theology of Mary and the scholars most likely to applaud the initiative. But, by a vote of 23-0, the commission advised against promulgating the new dogma. It was, the panel argued, contrary to the teaching of Vatican Council II, ambigous in its wording and insensitive to “the ecumenical difficulties” such a definition of dogma would cause....
Thanks, TS.
Wendy Howard...editor of Despatch
.
`Despatch'
Magazine & "Beauty
for Ashes" Booklet
Childrens
Devotions also access daily
email
devotions
bi-monthly
Mini-Despatch
.
Click
Here
despatch@mail.cth.com.au